Skip Navigation


Enterprise and Society Advance Access originally published online on April 4, 2008
Enterprise and Society 2008 9(2):281-313; doi:10.1093/es/khn003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/2/281    most recent
khn003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velkar, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Caveat Emptor: Abolishing Public Measurements, Standardizing Quantities, and Enhancing Market Transparency in the London Coal Trade c1830

Aashish Velkar

Aashish Velkar is PhD candidate at the London School of Economics

Contact information: Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. E-mail: A.Velkar{at}lse.ac.uk

This article evaluates efforts to standardize quantities in the London coal trade c1830, and traces the end of the public measurement system first introduced in the fourteenth century. Increasing traffic in coal, reduction of taxes on the commodity, inefficient public meters, etc., contributed to the demise of public measurements. This outcome was the result of extensive negotiations between merchants, the various levels of state bureaucracy, and the parliament. Switching measurement standards was difficult, if not costly, to coordinate. Abolishing public measurements and switching from volume to weight measurements was part of the efforts to strengthen governance along the commodity chain, secure property rights by making quantities predictable and alter a mechanism that powerful merchants considered had become inappropriate.


I am grateful for the generous help of the Carus-Wilson Graduate Research Studentship and the assistance of the project team of "How Well Do ‘Facts’ Travel?," a Leverhulme Trust/ ESRC funded project (No. F/07004/Z) that made this research possible. Early versions of this paper greatly benefited from comments by Mary Morgan, Peter Howlett, Jim Tomlinson, three anonymous referees, and seminar participants at London School of Economics, Economic History Society, Nuffield College, Oxford, and Imperial College, London.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.